<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="https://elezea.com/wp-content/themes/elz_2023/styles/pretty-feed-v3.xsl" type="text/xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" >
  <channel>
    <title>Elezea by Rian van der Merwe - RSS Feed</title>
    <atom:link href="https://elezea.com/2018/04/boring-tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <link>https://elezea.com/2018/04/boring-tech/</link>
    <description>A personal blog about product, technology, and interesting things that are worth sharing.</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 17:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <language></language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
          <item>
        <title>Why you should (usually) choose boring technology</title>
        <link>https://elezea.com/2018/04/boring-tech/</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 19:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Rian van der Merwe</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">https://elezea.com/?p=6405</guid>
        <description>
          <![CDATA[I’m late to this post on why it’s usually a good idea to choose boring technology. It’s so good.]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
          <![CDATA[<p>This is a fairly old post, but I only recently <a href="https://twitter.com/vboykis/status/582618460934578176">came across</a> Dan McKinley’s <a href="http://mcfunley.com/choose-boring-technology">Choose Boring Technology</a>. It is <em>so</em> good.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>What counts as boring? That&#8217;s a little tricky. &#8220;Boring&#8221; should not be conflated with &#8220;bad.&#8221; There is technology out there that is both boring and bad. You should not use any of that. But there are many choices of technology that are boring and good, or at least good enough. MySQL is boring. Postgres is boring. PHP is boring. Python is boring. Memcached is boring. Squid is boring. Cron is boring.</p>
<p>The nice thing about boringness (so constrained) is that the capabilities of these things are well understood. But more importantly, their failure modes are well understood.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>He goes on to explain the process you should go through <em>before</em> you try out a new technology.</p>
          <br>
          <br>
          <hr>
          Thanks for still believing in RSS! Get in touch <a href="https://elezea.com/contact">here</a> if you'd like.]]>
        </content:encoded>
                      </item>
      </channel>
</rss>