<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="https://elezea.com/wp-content/themes/elz_2023/styles/pretty-feed-v3.xsl" type="text/xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" >
  <channel>
    <title>Elezea by Rian van der Merwe - RSS Feed</title>
    <atom:link href="https://elezea.com/2016/01/utility-is-more-important-than-usability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <link>https://elezea.com/2016/01/utility-is-more-important-than-usability/</link>
    <description>A personal blog about product, technology, and interesting things that are worth sharing.</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 17:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <language></language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
          <item>
        <title>Utility is more important than usability</title>
        <link>https://elezea.com/2016/01/utility-is-more-important-than-usability/</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Rian van der Merwe</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">https://elezea.com/?p=5732</guid>
        <description>
          <![CDATA[I&#8217;ve long held Jakob Nielsen&#8217;s Useful = usability + utility formula in high regard. The Introduction to Usability article it comes from is still one of the best intros to user experience I&#8217;ve seen. That said, I&#8217;ve recently started to wonder about the ideal ratios on the right side of the equation. What combination of [&#8230;]]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
          <![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve long held Jakob Nielsen&#8217;s <em>Useful = usability + utility</em> formula in high regard. The <a href="https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/">Introduction to Usability</a> article it comes from is still one of the best intros to user experience I&#8217;ve seen. That said, I&#8217;ve recently started to wonder about the ideal ratios on the right side of the equation. What combination of usability and utility results in the most useful product? Is it a 50/50 split? 70% usability, 30% utility? It&#8217;s a purely academic exercise because there&#8217;s no way to prove any of it, but it did lead me to a theory:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I believe that <em>utility</em> (whether a product provides the features users need) is initially more important than <em>usability</em> (how easy &amp; pleasant these features are to use) in product design.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Let me say right up front that I&#8217;m not saying usability <em>isn&#8217;t</em> important. I&#8217;m just saying that when it comes to a product being used extensively (and payed for) by users, it is more important to get the utility right from the start. Users will struggle through bad usability (up to a point), but they won&#8217;t use a wonderfully usable product that doesn&#8217;t serve a real need (see Path).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give two personal examples to back up this view<sup id="fnref:5732.1"><a href="#fn:5732.1" rel="footnote">1</a></sup>. My favorite social network at the moment is <a href="https://www.goodreads.com/">Goodreads</a>. The site is slow, the UI is confusing, and the mobile apps make me feel completely lost, and yet I keep coming back to it. Because Goodreads is extremely good at what it does: helping me find books I&#8217;d enjoy, and letting me share good books with friends.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" title="Goodreads" src="https://cdn.elezea.com/images/goodreads-ui.jpg" border="0" alt="Goodreads" /></p>
<p>The second example is <a href="https://pinboard.in/u:rianvdm">Pinboard</a>. If I could take only one website with me to a deserted island it would be Pinboard. I use it more than any other online service. It helps me save, categorize, and find all the useful articles I&#8217;ve read over the 5 years I&#8217;ve been using it. The UI has tons of little weird quirks, and it&#8217;s very much barebones. But that doesn&#8217;t matter. It&#8217;s indispensable to me, so I care very little about its usability.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" title="Pinboard" src="https://cdn.elezea.com/images/pinboard-ui.jpg" border="0" alt="Pinboard" /></p>
<p>These two examples lead me to a second theory:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The more <em>utility</em> a product has, the less its <em>usability</em> matters.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I like Goodreads, but at some point if the usability becomes <em>too</em> frustrating, I&#8217;ll just leave. For Pinboard, on the other hand, I&#8217;ll walk through usability hell and back just to keep using it. It&#8217;s that essential to my work.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve said this a few times in this article, but let me reiterate: I&#8217;m not, for a second, saying that usability isn&#8217;t important. I&#8217;m proposing that if you have a product that has insane levels of utility, its usability becomes a secondary factor in its success. To put it another way, the ROI on increasing <em>utility</em> is probably much higher than the ROI on improving <em>usability</em>.</p>
<p>The moral of the story is this: first find an idea that people can&#8217;t live without, <em>then</em> make it a beautiful, usable product. It&#8217;s very difficult to do it the other way around.</p>
<hr />
<p><em>If you liked this article, you can sign up to get an email every Friday with all new posts that appeared on the site that week. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time.</em></p>
<p><!-- Begin MailChimp Signup Form -->
<link href="//cdn-images.mailchimp.com/embedcode/slim-081711.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"/>
<style type="text/css">
    #mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; clear:left; font:14px Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; }
    /* Add your own MailChimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block.
       We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */
</style>
</p>
<div id="mc_embed_signup">
<form action="//elezea.us2.list-manage.com/subscribe/post?u=59294179afb9b71d990a71f02&amp;id=3365c51b4b" method="post" id="mc-embedded-subscribe-form" name="mc-embedded-subscribe-form" class="validate" target="_blank" novalidate>
<div id="mc_embed_signup_scroll">
    <label for="mce-EMAIL"></label><br />
    <input type="email" value="" name="EMAIL" class="email" id="mce-EMAIL" placeholder="Email address" required/><br />
    <!-- real people should not fill this in and expect good things - do not remove this or risk form bot signups--></p>
<div style="position: absolute; left: -5000px;" aria-hidden="true"><input type="text" name="b_59294179afb9b71d990a71f02_3365c51b4b" tabindex="-1" value=""/></div>
<div class="clear"><input type="submit" value="Subscribe" name="subscribe" id="mc-embedded-subscribe" class="btn btn-secondary btn-jumbo"/></div>
</p></div>
</form>
</div>
<p><!--End mc_embed_signup--></p>
<div class="footnotes">
<hr />
<ol>
<li id="fn:5732.1">
<p>That&#8217;s how science works, right?&#160;<a href="#fnref:5732.1" rev="footnote">&#8617;</a></p>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
          <br>
          <br>
          <hr>
          Thanks for still believing in RSS! Get in touch <a href="https://elezea.com/contact">here</a> if you'd like.]]>
        </content:encoded>
                      </item>
      </channel>
</rss>