<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="https://elezea.com/wp-content/themes/elz_2023/styles/pretty-feed-v3.xsl" type="text/xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" >
  <channel>
    <title>Elezea by Rian van der Merwe - RSS Feed</title>
    <atom:link href="https://elezea.com/2014/07/autocorrect-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <link>https://elezea.com/2014/07/autocorrect-history/</link>
    <description>A personal blog about product, technology, and interesting things that are worth sharing.</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 17:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <language></language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
          <item>
        <title>A history of autocorrect</title>
        <link>https://elezea.com/2014/07/autocorrect-history/</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 23:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Rian van der Merwe</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">https://elezea.com/?p=4913</guid>
        <description>
          <![CDATA[Gideon Lewis-Kraus discusses The Fasinatng … Frustrating … Fascinating History of Autocorrect. Turns out there&#8217;s more to it than meets the eye: A handful of factors are taken into account to weight the variables: keyboard proximity, phonetic similarity, linguistic context. But it’s essentially a big popularity contest. A Microsoft engineer showed me a slide where [&#8230;]]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
          <![CDATA[<p>Gideon Lewis-Kraus discusses <em><a href="http://www.wired.com/2014/07/history-of-autocorrect/">The Fasinatng … Frustrating … Fascinating History of Autocorrect</a></em>. Turns out there&#8217;s more to it than meets the eye:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>A handful of factors are taken into account to weight the variables: keyboard proximity, phonetic similarity, linguistic context. But it’s essentially a big popularity contest. A Microsoft engineer showed me a slide where somebody was trying to search for the long-named Austrian action star who became governor of California. Schwarzenegger, he explained, “is about 10,000 times more popular in the world than its variants”—Shwaranegar or Scuzzynectar or what have you. Autocorrect has become an index of the most popular way to spell and order certain words.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This article also taught me that swear words are complicated. And I really like the cartoons of various autocorrect errors, especially this one:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" title="Damn you autocorrect" src="https://cdn.elezea.com/images/autocorrect.jpg" border="0" alt="Damn you autocorrect" /></p>
          <br>
          <br>
          <hr>
          Thanks for still believing in RSS! Get in touch <a href="https://elezea.com/contact">here</a> if you'd like.]]>
        </content:encoded>
                      </item>
      </channel>
</rss>