<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="https://elezea.com/wp-content/themes/elz_2023/styles/pretty-feed-v3.xsl" type="text/xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" >
  <channel>
    <title>Elezea by Rian van der Merwe - RSS Feed</title>
    <atom:link href="https://elezea.com/2013/01/startups-failure-and-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <link>https://elezea.com/2013/01/startups-failure-and-problems/</link>
    <description>A personal blog about product, technology, and interesting things that are worth sharing.</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 17:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <language></language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
          <item>
        <title>Startups, failure, and focusing on customer problems</title>
        <link>https://elezea.com/2013/01/startups-failure-and-problems/</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Rian van der Merwe</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">https://elezea.com/?p=3980</guid>
        <description>
          <![CDATA[The biggest cause of startup failure is focusing on finding buyers for cool technology, as opposed to identifying marketing problems first.]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
          <![CDATA[<p>Peter Matthaei wrote down some thoughts on failure, startups, and product development in <em><a href="http://mobivangelist.com/post/41222643619/all-the-use-cases">ALL THE USE CASES</a></em>. He makes some good points, like this one:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Every great company started by being great at solving just a single problem. Quite often, a very humble one. But they solved that one problem incredibly well, picked up momentum, and with large doses of relentless ambition, good timing, vision and luck kept on going.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Dropbox is, of course, the poster child for this line of thinking. One of my favorite Quora answers is still Michael Wolfe&#8217;s response to <em><a href="http://www.quora.com/Dropbox/Why-is-Dropbox-more-popular-than-other-programs-with-similar-functionality">Why is Dropbox more popular than other programs with similar functionality?</a></em>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&#8220;But,&#8221; you may ask, &#8220;so much more you could do! What about task management, calendaring, customized dashboards, virtual white boarding. More than just folders and files!&#8221;</p>
<p>No, shut up. People don&#8217;t use that crap. They just want a folder. A folder that syncs.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I would add that I think the problem with most startups is not necessarily that they&#8217;re trying to solve too many problems; it&#8217;s that they&#8217;re trying to provide solutions to problems that don&#8217;t exist. I love this quote from Pragmatic Marketing in their post <em><a href="http://www.pragmaticmarketing.com//resources/who-needs-product-management?p=0">Who Needs Product Management?</a></em>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>It is vastly easier to identify market problems and solve them with technology than it is to find buyers for<br />
  your existing technology.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>My thesis continues to be that the single biggest cause of startup failure is focusing on finding buyers for cool technology, as opposed to identifying (and fully understanding) market problems first.</p>
          <br>
          <br>
          <hr>
          Thanks for still believing in RSS! Get in touch <a href="https://elezea.com/contact">here</a> if you'd like.]]>
        </content:encoded>
                      </item>
      </channel>
</rss>