<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="https://elezea.com/wp-content/themes/elz_2023/styles/pretty-feed-v3.xsl" type="text/xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" >
  <channel>
    <title>Elezea by Rian van der Merwe - RSS Feed</title>
    <atom:link href="https://elezea.com/2012/07/email-brevity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <link>https://elezea.com/2012/07/email-brevity/</link>
    <description>A personal blog about product, technology, and interesting things that are worth sharing.</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 17:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <language></language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
          <item>
        <title>The virtues of short emails and long conversations</title>
        <link>https://elezea.com/2012/07/email-brevity/</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Rian van der Merwe</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">https://elezea.com/?p=3139</guid>
        <description>
          <![CDATA[Eric Spiegelman writes about the virtue of brevity in email: Long emails are, more frequently than not, the worst. When you send someone an email, you make a demand on their time. If you use more words than necessary, you waste their time. Sure w&#8217;re talking maybe a fraction of a minute, but given the [&#8230;]]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
          <![CDATA[<p>Eric Spiegelman writes about <a href="http://spiegelman.tumblr.com/post/27082261842/on-the-virtue-of-brevity-in-email">the virtue of brevity in email</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Long emails are, more frequently than not, the worst. When you send someone an email, you make a demand on their time. If you use more words than necessary, you waste their time. Sure w&#8217;re talking maybe a fraction of a minute, but given the number of emails the average person sends in a day those fractions add up pretty quick.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This makes intuitive sense, and anyone who gets a lot of email would agree. I&#8217;ve even tried to adhere to the <a href="http://five.sentenc.es/">Five Sentences</a> philosophy for a while — with not much success.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s something in me that wants to resist this move to get rid of all the &#8220;fluff&#8221; in email. Sure, it makes you less productive if you have to read through a bunch of stuff that&#8217;s not relevant — but I wonder if there&#8217;s a danger that the way we talk in email will spill over to the way we talk to our friends and family. Just like &#8220;LOL&#8221; jumped from text messaging and IM to enter our vernacular in all kinds of weird forms like &#8220;For the lulz&#8221;<sup id="fnref:3139.1"><a href="#fn:3139.1" rel="footnote">1</a></sup>.</p>
<p>Patrick Rhone recently wrote an article called <em><a href="http://patrickrhone.com/2012/07/11/twalden/">Twalden</a></em> (it&#8217;s worth reading just to discover why he chose that title), where he discusses why he&#8217;s taking a break from Twitter:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Ultimately, I don’t know if what Twitter has become is for me, or the people I care about, or the conversations I wish to have. The things I want to know are “happening” — like good news about a friend’s success, or bad news about their relationship, or even just the fact they are eating a sandwich and the conversation around such — I wish to have at length and without distraction. Such conversations remain best when done directly, and there are plenty of existing and better communication methods for that.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The phrase <em>at length and without distraction</em> really stuck with me. When&#8217;s the last time you had a discussion at length and without distraction? It seems to become rarer and rarer these days. I&#8217;m not trying to draw a causation effect between short, get-to-the-point emails and the general distractedness of our everyday conversations. I&#8217;m just saying that it&#8217;s probably ok to say &#8220;Hi!&#8221; and &#8220;Thank you&#8221; in emails every once in a while, because it&#8217;s nice to be nice.</p>
<div class="footnotes">
<hr />
<ol>
<li id="fn:3139.1">
<p>Ok, maybe I just hang out with really weird people.&#160;<a href="#fnref:3139.1" rev="footnote">&#8617;</a></p>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
          <br>
          <br>
          <hr>
          Thanks for still believing in RSS! Get in touch <a href="https://elezea.com/contact">here</a> if you'd like.]]>
        </content:encoded>
                      </item>
      </channel>
</rss>