<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="https://elezea.com/wp-content/themes/elz_2023/styles/pretty-feed-v3.xsl" type="text/xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" >
  <channel>
    <title>Elezea by Rian van der Merwe - RSS Feed</title>
    <atom:link href="https://elezea.com/2011/09/in-defense-of-rss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <link>https://elezea.com/2011/09/in-defense-of-rss/</link>
    <description>A personal blog about product, technology, and interesting things that are worth sharing.</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 17:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <language></language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
          <item>
        <title>In defense of RSS</title>
        <link>https://elezea.com/2011/09/in-defense-of-rss/</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 19:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Rian van der Merwe</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">https://elezea.com/?p=1497</guid>
        <description>
          <![CDATA[Some thoughts on the recent debate on the benefits of RSS vs. Twitter as information sources. A summary of the main arguments plus additional tips on making RSS work for you.]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
          <![CDATA[<p>There was plenty of chatter about RSS over the weekend, mainly because of <a href="http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2011/09/why-keeping-up-with-rss-is-poisonous-to-productivity-sanity.ars">this &#8220;you&#8217;re doing it wrong&#8221; article</a> on Ars Technica.</p>
<p>Most of the responses I&#8217;ve seen are strong defenses of RSS, and I&#8217;m happy about that. There has been so much talk about Twitter replacing RSS that I&#8217;ve been wondering if anyone else still uses it as much as I do. In fact, because of the iPad and apps like <a href="http://reederapp.com">Reeder</a>, my RSS usage is at an all-time high.</p>
<p>Marco Arment <a href="http://www.marco.org/2011/09/04/sane-rss-usage">argues for a combined Twitter/RSS setup</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>I can follow tons of low-traffic sites and keep my reading list more diverse than if I relied only on social links, but other people ensure that I never miss anything great on the high-volume sites.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ben Brooks has a different use case (more similar to mine) &#8211; he subscribes to lots of feeds, but he doesn&#8217;t allow the unread count to bother him. He makes a <a href="http://brooksreview.net/2011/09/rss-use/">good point about not blaming RSS if you feel overwhelmed</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>A tool is a tool. Should I get mad at my car because there are thousands of miles of road I haven&#8217;t driven yet to drive? No. If you don&#8217;t like RSS don&#8217;t use it. If you want to use it but don&#8217;t want to have thousands of items, then use it like Marco does. Or use it like I do and check the feeds more often.</p></blockquote>
<p>But of course, no discussion on RSS is complete until <a href="http://scripting.com/stories/2011/09/04/rssIsSupposedToBeReallySim.html">its creator weighs in</a>. Dave Winer blames feed readers (like Google Reader) and their insistence on showing you how many unread items you have, and asks us to separate that from the technology itself:</p>
<blockquote><p>If you miss five days of reading the news because you were on vacation (good for you!) the newspaper you read the first day back isn&#8217;t five times as thick as the normal day&#8217;s paper. And it doesn&#8217;t have your name on the cover saying &#8220;Joe you haven&#8217;t read 1,942,279 articles since this paper started.&#8221; It doesn&#8217;t put you on the hook for reading everything anyone has ever written. The paper doesn&#8217;t care, so why does your RSS reader?</p></blockquote>
<p>These guys all make a very good case for RSS so I&#8217;m not going to say too much more about it. I do want to add something I haven&#8217;t seen mentioned before though: using folders in your RSS reader to help manage the deluge of information. Here is a screenshot of my folder structure in Reeder:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://elezea.s3.amazonaws.com/images/rss-folders.jpg" alt="RSS folders" align="left" /></p>
<p>I have a certain set of blogs that I tag as favorites, and those are the ones I read first. If ther&#8217;s time I move on to the others.</p>
<p>Note that I have a folder called &#8220;Large tech blogs&#8221;. The usual suspects are in there: TechCrunch, Mashable, Ars Technica, Wired&#8230; These blogs post a lot, so when the unread numbers get out of control I typically just scan some headlines and then mark all as read. With the big blogs I know that if something is really important, Twitter will tell me.</p>
<p>RSS will remain an important part of my workflow, and since I turn dock unread badges off, I don&#8217;t feel like my app of choice is silently judging me.</p>
<p>Setting up folders and actively managing your RSS feeds is hard work. But the payoff is huge for me &#8211; I can quickly get a broad overview of what&#8217;s going on in the industry without having to rely on the fleeting nature of a tweet coming across my timeline.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a die-hard fan.</p>
<p>(By the way, if you&#8217;re interested in following my shared items, you can <a href="http://www.google.com/reader/shared/rianvdm">do so here</a>)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
          <br>
          <br>
          <hr>
          Thanks for still believing in RSS! Get in touch <a href="https://elezea.com/contact">here</a> if you'd like.]]>
        </content:encoded>
                      </item>
      </channel>
</rss>