<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="https://elezea.com/wp-content/themes/elz_2023/styles/pretty-feed-v3.xsl" type="text/xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" >
  <channel>
    <title>Elezea by Rian van der Merwe - RSS Feed</title>
    <atom:link href="https://elezea.com/2010/01/time-to-start-demanding-good-user-experience-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <link>https://elezea.com/2010/01/time-to-start-demanding-good-user-experience-design/</link>
    <description>A personal blog about product, technology, and interesting things that are worth sharing.</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 17:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <language></language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
          <item>
        <title>It&#8217;s 2010. Isn&#8217;t it time to start demanding good user experience design?</title>
        <link>https://elezea.com/2010/01/time-to-start-demanding-good-user-experience-design/</link>
        <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>Rian van der Merwe</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">https://elezea.com/?p=335</guid>
        <description>
          <![CDATA[Trying to pay from something on Rodale's website made me realize that it's time to demand a better user experience everywhere we go.]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
          <![CDATA[<p>I should probably get up, walk around, and have a cup of coffee before I write this post.  Or maybe a little righteous anger over something small is good for the soul?  I&#8217;ll go with the latter&#8230;  I recently ordered a 2010 calender from <a href="http://www.runnersworld.com" target="_blank">Runner&#8217;s World</a>.  A few days ago I received the calendar, along with the invoice.  Their payment is handled through a company called Rodale.  I just went to pay my invoice at <a href="http://www.rodalequickpay.com" target="_blank">www.rodalequickpay.com</a>, and the experience left me frustrated, and incidentally still in debt to Runner&#8217;s World.</p>
<p>I know this shouldn&#8217;t bother me that much, but let me walk you through the experience, and then make a couple of observations.<br />
<span id="more-335"></span></p>
<h2>The Rodale order process</h2>
<p>I typed in www.rodalequickpay.com (yes, the irony of the &#8220;quickpay&#8221; part of the URL is pretty thick), and arrived at this screen:</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" title="Rodale 1" src="http://rianvdm.smugmug.com/photos/761603180_xqxhm-M.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="315" />Immediately, this bugs me.  I just want to pay an invoice, I don&#8217;t want to have to create an account.  There&#8217;s also so much wrong about this design:</p>
<ul>
<li>There are <strong>two calls to action</strong>, and the affordance is all wrong.  The first text you see is &#8220;If you are a new visitor&#8230;&#8221;, but the &#8220;Create New Login&#8221; button is too far away, making it look like you should log in if you are a new visitor.</li>
<li><strong>The &#8220;Login&#8221; button</strong>&#8230; first of all, it&#8217;s &#8220;Log in&#8221; (action), not &#8220;Login&#8221; (noun), but let&#8217;s ignore that pet peeve for now.  The button looks different from the top button, and is also much smaller, resulting in a pretty confusing experience on this first screen.</li>
<li>I don&#8217;t understand the text &#8220;<strong>Please use this site to pay orders in full</strong>&#8221; at the bottom.  Not sure why it&#8217;s needed, and not sure why it&#8217;s not at the top of the screen.  Who is going to read that far down?</li>
</ul>
<p>But ok, since I am a new visitor, I decided to create a new Login:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" title="Rodale 2" src="http://rianvdm.smugmug.com/photos/761603183_judcP-M.jpg" alt="" width="542" height="450" />Ok, this is where things get really out of control.</p>
<ul>
<li>I&#8217;m not even going to begin to talk about <strong>the copy</strong>.  &#8220;eMail&#8221; in one spot, &#8220;E-Mail&#8221; in another?  And &#8220;Thank you!&#8221;?  But I digress.</li>
<li>The first big problem here is that <strong><em>account creation</em> and <em>invoice detail information</em> happen on the same screen</strong>.  I should enter my <em>account level</em> information first, and then move on to my <em>transaction level</em> information.  Especially considering that&#8230;</li>
<li>&#8230;It is <strong>extremely difficult to find your account number and invoice number on the paper statement</strong>.  First, the microcopy about where to find it is not useful at all.  There is no &#8220;appropriate button&#8221; to click, and the clickable text &#8220;On My Invoice&#8221; and &#8220;On My Statement&#8221; don&#8217;t look like links and actually don&#8217;t go anywhere when you click on them.  (Read <a href="http://www.polon.co.uk/notebook/entry/website-microcopy/" target="_blank">this post</a> at Polon, and <a href="http://bokardo.com/archives/writing-microcopy/" target="_blank">this one</a> by Joshua Porter about the importance of writing good microcopy on forms)</li>
</ul>
<p>So anyway, I start typing in random numbers from my paper invoice just to see if I can get somewhere, and this is the error message I get:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter" title="Rodale 4" src="http://rianvdm.smugmug.com/photos/761617969_NKRLz-M.jpg" alt="" width="445" height="135" /></p>
<p>Ok, now we&#8217;re getting somewhere.  Don&#8217;t know why it&#8217;s a browser error, but fine.  So I know I&#8217;m looking for an Account number of &gt;10 characters and an Order number of &gt;12 characters.  Turns out that&#8217;s not entirely accurate though.  The form doesn&#8217;t let you enter more than 10 or 12 characters depending on the field.  So those numbers should actually be <em>exactly</em> 10 and 12 characters.  Why doesn&#8217;t the error message say that?  &#8220;Can not be less than&#8221;?  But hey, we&#8217;re making progress.  Off I go to look for those numbers.  It appears I got my Account number right, because next I got this error message:</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter" title="Rodale 3" src="http://rianvdm.smugmug.com/photos/761603181_xVv9E-M.jpg" alt="" width="487" height="63" />Ok, now we have in-line messaging, not browser error messaging.  But whatever.  I verified the crap out of that number, but I couldn&#8217;t get past this screen.  It actually makes me sad because I&#8217;m sure the payment page would have been a real treat to write about.  I tried to call the toll free number but no one&#8217;s there, so as of this moment I still owe Runner&#8217;s World $21.75.  I&#8217;m really sorry guys, I will pay you as soon as you let me.</p>
<h2>The point I&#8217;m trying to make</h2>
<p>So here&#8217;s the problem.  The Rodale website was put together to accept payment.  This is how they make money.  But there was absolutely 0 thought put into the user experience, so I was simply unable to pay them.  And look, I know it&#8217;s much easier to take a design apart than it is to create a good one, I get that.  But UX design is becoming a mature field now.  It&#8217;s 2010.  <strong>Shouldn&#8217;t we be able to get rid of designs like this, and demand something better?</strong> It&#8217;s not rocket science, it&#8217;s a <a href="http://astheria.com/design/learn-about-design-not-making-things-pretty" target="_blank">methodical</a> <a href="http://sixrevisions.com/usabilityaccessibility/creating-a-timeless-user-experience/" target="_blank">thought processes</a> to design a good experience.  Form design is difficult to get right, but it doesn&#8217;t have to <a href="http://www.lukew.com/ff/entry.asp?968" target="_blank">look like Apple</a>, it just has to get you through the process without friction.</p>
<p>What do you think?  Is it too early to rise up in anger against designs like this?  If not, what can we do to &#8220;spread the UX&#8221;, so to speak?</p>
          <br>
          <br>
          <hr>
          Thanks for still believing in RSS! Get in touch <a href="https://elezea.com/contact">here</a> if you'd like.]]>
        </content:encoded>
                      </item>
      </channel>
</rss>